Quantcast

Show-Me State Times

Wednesday, December 4, 2024

Rx drug spending up 19% through federal program that includes 69 Missouri hospitals

Webp cbohrsadirectors

Phillip Swagel, director, Congressional Budget Office, left, and Carole Johnson, Administrator of the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), which administers the 340b program. | CBO.gov / HRSA.gov

Phillip Swagel, director, Congressional Budget Office, left, and Carole Johnson, Administrator of the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), which administers the 340b program. | CBO.gov / HRSA.gov

Spending on prescription drugs purchased at participating health care providers through the federal 340b drug discount program increased 19% annually between 2010 and 2021.

That’s according to a Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report released June 17.

“Eighty-eight percent of the growth in 340B spending from 2010 to 2021 can be attributed to spending on drugs prescribed by hospitals and their affiliated off-site clinics,” said a presentation on the report provided by Rebecca Sachs and Joshua Varcie of the CBO’s Health Analysis Division.

Missouri has 69 hospitals participating in the 340b program, which is a federal initiative that enables eligible hospitals and healthcare organizations to purchase outpatient medications at significantly discounted prices.

Established in 1992 and administered by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) the program aims to provide financial relief to healthcare providers serving vulnerable populations, allowing them to stretch their scarce resources and reach more eligible patients.

Hospitals participating in the 340B program can use the savings to fund essential services and programs, such as free or low-cost medication assistance, expanded access to healthcare, and community outreach initiatives.

Participating hospitals, however, “often extend their 340B discounts to clinics in well-off communities, where they can charge privately insured patients more than those on Medicaid,” reported the Wall Street Journal.

“In some cases, the program appears to be bolstering profits in well-off areas more than it is underwriting services in less-privileged neighborhoods,” said the Journal article.

The executive director of Patients Come First - Missouri (PCF-MO) said there is “growing concern” that the 340b program isn’t passing along drug savings Missouri patients.

“There is growing concern that the federal program’s lack of oversight is allowing bad actors to turn around and charge patients higher prices and pocket the difference or use the profits to invest in unrelated programs,” wrote Farrow in a Missouri Times op-ed. “As they fund their own special interests, the most vulnerable patients are left unable to afford their medications.”

“This is contrary to the program’s intended purpose.”

Dr. Anthony DiGiorgio, a neurosurgeon and senior affiliated scholar at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, told Show-Me State Times that drug discounts often aren’t passed along from the hospitals to the patients.

“Because the discount is mandatory, many drugs come out with higher list prices than they normally would, but patients pay that copay at the higher list price,” he said. “Patients are actually paying more than they otherwise would if the 340b program didn't exist.”

Naomi Lopez, senior fellow at The Goldwater Institute, said “we don’t actually know” if drug discounts are being passed to patients by organizations participating in the 340b program, reported Show-Me State Times on April 10.

“The real problem is that we don't know if they're making a huge profit, where those profits are going, or if those funds are actually going to care for the low income indigent population,” said Lopez. “We're definitely looking at billions of dollars, and we don't actually know because of the lack of transparency and accountability in the program.”

If those discounts aren’t reaching patients, wrote Farrow, “the program is not functioning as it should.”

“Access to affordable medicines is critical, especially to the impoverished in underserved communities that the 340B program was intended to help,” she wrote. “Patients on the receiving end of this program already face significant barriers to care, including being able to afford treatments, residing in rural communities with fewer care facilities and various adverse health outcomes.”

The U.S. House Energy and Commerce Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee held a June 4 hearing on the 340b program. U.S. Rep. John Joyce (R-PA-13) said in during the hearing that the program’s growth has created “misaligned incentives” that are driving up patient costs. 

“This growth has created misaligned incentives across the entire health care system, leading to further consolidation that drives up prices for every patient,” said Joyce.

MORE NEWS